Do Voters Reward Good Policy?
Governors who expanded social-welfare programs in their state were rewarded by voters—in the short run.
## The Role of Voter Sophistication in Policy Feedback Loops### Understanding Policy Feedback LoopsA policy feedback loop occurs when a government policy creates a new constituency that benefits from the policy. This constituency, driven either by resource or perception-related incentives, becomes invested in ensuring the policy's continuation.### Voter Sophistication and Feedback LoopsPolitical scientists have debated the level of voter sophistication in interpreting government policies and rewarding politicians based on those policies. Some argue that voters are pessimistic, unable to consistently detect and respond to policy changes.### Research on EITC and Voter ApprovalA recent study examined the effects of state-implemented Earned Income Tax Credits (EITCs) on gubernatorial approval ratings. EITCs are tax credits designed to benefit working-class individuals. Key findings:* Implementing a state EITC led to a two-percentage-point increase in favor of the incumbent governor.* This positive effect was strongest in counties with high federal EITC claimants, suggesting some comprehension of the policy's source.* However, this effect did not vary based on the size of EITC benefits, indicating that voters were not responding primarily to the monetary gain.* Over time, the initial boost in approval ratings diminished, suggesting that other factors (e.g., scandals) can override policy feedback loops.### Implications for Political Sophistication and Good GovernanceThe study's findings support the idea of voter sophistication. Voters are capable of detecting and rewarding politicians based on policy benefits, even if these benefits are small.Additionally, it highlights the role of political messaging and democratic processes in enabling policy-feedback loops. Politicians should focus on communicating their policy actions to voters and ensuring that policies align with voter preferences.Ideological polarization among politicians can also hinder policy-feedback loops, as politicians may prioritize their beliefs over public sentiment. Both parties should be encouraged to engage with voters and respond to their needs to promote democratic accountability and good governance.